Standard pressure 9mm VASTLY outperforms .38 special in a handgun. The simple nature of the revolver means that if a dud primer is struck, you can just pull the trigger again and move to the next round. 06421/48075-00 - Fax 06421/48075-99 - … .38 spl jhp 5 hits 175-350 cents a round. The .38 Special was developed in 1898 as an improvement over the .38 Long Colt, a much weaker standard military issue revolver cartridge that proved too weak and inadequate against the Moro Juramentados — the badass, faith-blinded adrenaline-overdosed Muslim warriors American soldiers had trouble taking down during the Philippine-American War. more rifling than a 3.5 in. By the same token, if all that’s left in my LGS are jacketed hollow points, I would pick the 9mm because it will have a better chance of expansion due to its higher velocity and muzzle energy. the Luger pistol, which required high pressure cartridges to cycle) where cartridges are housed inside the grip area rather than the separate cylinder commonly found in revolvers, the 9mm case length had to be short to conform with the grip’s overall dimensions. After trying it out in the range, he brought it to me and asked me to shoot a few rounds and tell me what I think about it. Yeah, often both hands of a qualified gun smith. There is no reason to have a NYPD style trigger. It’s an apples-to-oranges type of comparison — there’s no practical reason for it, so ultimately, it’s pointless. If your top priorities consist of range, trajectory and stopping power then go for .38 Super. But don’t expect the recoil to feel like a small 9mm semi-auto like the Ruger LC9 or S&W Shield. I’d rather avoid opening a can of worms — these types of comparisons lead to debates that can get ugly real fast. Picked up a Taurus 692 recently which shoots both with easily switchable wheels. .38+P comes close, but falls short, despite the test .38 special having an extra half inch of barrel(4″). But the fact of the matter is smokeless powder eventually replaced black powder as bullet propellant for a number of good reasons, among which: It burns cleaner (reducing fouling in barrels); It produces more heat due to its chemically bonded composition (which translates to more pressure); It burns faster in higher pressure environments (such as in a firearm’s chamber). Nothing wrong with carrying a .38 snubbie as a backup to a main gun. +P semi-wadcutter lead hollow point. Check their respective weights on the company’s website. The 9×19 has twice the MAP of the .38 Special in original loads, so of course the 9×19 will win on velocity in a canonical loading. You listed one of these guns in your article… the Ruger LCR. Where they differ greatly is in the ballistic performance area. But what are the chances that my LGS would have such a limited supply of ammo? All excellent and truthful points. I see these revolver vs semi comparisons. Easy to carry and put to use…..until you need to reload…then it’s a bit fussy. The selections spreads apart when you start loading the 9mm under higher pressure. Conceal carry and 5.7 ? 2" Revolver 9mm Parabellum vs. 38 Special + P vs. .357 Mag. All other things being equal i.e. .38 Special is a legacy cartridge that soldiers on because there are so many guns chambered in the round. Alabama Arsenal did a review on the CMMG 5.7 Banshee. The .38 revolver is not just for the old-school Hollywood cops you see on TV and in movies. Whatever the perceived shortcomings might be when considering 38 vs 9mm, the .38 Special has a number of virtues that are all too often overlooked. use practically the same diameter bullets which punch holes that are pretty much the same size Unlike the other articles in the State Your Case series, I can’t really pick a “winner” on this one. Second, at very close range, full wadcutter bullets could over-penetrate. The trouble is actually finding any full wadcutter factory ammunition with muzzle velocities above 800 fps out of snubnosed revolvers. That’s right, it’s pretty much already faded into history. A better comparison might be .38SPL vs. .380ACP. . A disadvantage to automatics is that they can have more complicated stoppages that require both hands to clear. Cool, I looked over the data you linked, and 9mm still beats .38 special with 9mm being the top performer for penetration, expansion, and velocity out of a 3.5″ barrel. This is 38.25% more energy at the muzzle in favor of the 9mm. Good point, on average a .38 Special revolver will experience fewer malfunctions than a 9mm pistol. My favorite .38 Special self-defense loads are 150 grain full wadcutters. The .38 Special is probably the most common revolver cartridge in use today, and is certainly the most carried, frequently in pistols that will accommodate .357 Magnum rounds. The mechanism is two-fold. 5.7 is faster, shinier, prettier, and newer then either of these old fudd rounds. They have effectively stifled a great deal of innovation among other things. The .38 Special in a compact snub-nose carry gun is coming out of a barrel that’s usually less than two inches, where many small 9mm pistols have barrel lengths up to an inch longer for a gun of similar size. If I’m correct, a 4 in. ARX Interceptor and Lehigh Defense) coupled with modern powder charge load data, the relatively weaker rimmed cartridge can go toe-to-toe with the more powerful rimless cartridge as far as terminal performance, i.e.
Energy Race Digital Breakout Answers, Ryobi Drill Chuck Replacement, Two Thermostats One Furnace, Sc Code Of Laws Title 56, Cattle Crush For Sale Ebay, Names That Mean Life In Japanese,